CPR Working Paper Series No. 39

Can Policy Changes be Treated as Natural Experiments? Evidence from State Excise Taxes

Jeffrey D. Kubik and John R. Moran 

July 2002
(Revised from September 2001)

 

Abstract:

    An important issue in public policy analysis is the potential endogeneity of the policies under study. If policy changes constitute responses on the part of political decision-makers to changes in a variable of interest, then standard analyses that treat policy changes as natural experiments may yield biased estimates of the impact of the policy (Besley and Case 2000). We examine the extent to which such political endogeneity biases conventional fixed effects estimates of behavioral parameters by identifying the elasticities of demand for cigarettes and beer using the timing of state legislative elections as an instrument for changes in state excise taxes. In both cases, we find sizable differences between these estimated demand elasticities and the fixed effect estimates cited in Evans, Ringel, and Stech (1999). We conclude that the use of fixed effects estimators in environments where policy interventions are endogenously determined may lead to large biases in the estimated effects of the policies.

 You can download a PDF version of the abstract and paper then view it and print it using a FREE copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader.

Click here for the Adobe Acrobat version of CPR Working Paper 39

Or for more information on ordering a hard copy of this paper, please contact the Publications Officer, Center for Policy Research, 426 Eggers Hall, Syracuse University, Syracuse, New York 13244-1020 or e-mail our Publications Officer at puboff@maxwell.syr.edu. Each hard copy costs $5.00 (US) and payment should be included with mail order.

 

---

File current as of

If you have any questions or comments, please contact the webmaster.